>To those of you who contributed to the the book and
>Fusebox.org, please don't get me wrong. I appreciate
>your work.
Thanks Patrick. To be honest it was one of the hardest things I have ever
been a part of (but worth it in the end), with having a full-time job and
butchering the english language like I do. Thank God for editors!
>"These are the
>best/most common practices used by the Fusebox
>community as of ..." would be a wonderful help.
This is a great idea, anyone who has time to do such a thing is more than
welcome. I am sure Steve would put it on the site pronto!
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: arguments **against** fusebox
Okay, let me douse this flame before it gets out of
control. The main reason I was disappointed about
the book is that I was misinformed. I was under the
impression that there was information in the book
that I couldn't find anywhere else. I was even more
disppointed when I found out there wasn't. Which
brings me back to my original point: there isn't
really a standard and I think there ought to be.
I'm not suggesting that Steve or anyone else should
be soley responsible for maintaing the standard, or
that 100% conformance should even be considered a
goal. But a document that says, "These are the
best/most common practices used by the Fusebox
community as of ..." would be a wonderful help.
To those of you who contributed to the the book and
Fusebox.org, please don't get me wrong. I appreciate
your work.
Patrick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:00 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: arguments **against** fusebox
>
>
> > (Please bear in
> > mind that I'm still bitter about having to purchase
> > an "open standard.")
>
> Patrick,
>
> I can understand why you feel that way, but it might help to consider a
> couple things:
>
> (1) Any of us could sit down and pound out a concise guide to fundamental
> Fusebox and give it away... no one is forcing us to buy anything. The guts
> of Fusebox are right here on this list, where the methodology lives and
> breathes and grows, not in the book.
>
> (2) Fusebox isn't Steve. He still comes up with more interesting
> ideas than
> anyone else, but the methodology has grown beyond him. The version of
> Fusebox presented in the book isn't somehow canonized or anything... the
> minute someone writes up a free, up-to-the-minute version, the
> book will be
> obsolete. (As pure documentation, anyway... writing style and teaching
> methods are a different matter entirely.)
>
>
> --
> Roger
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
