> You know, a particular idea has occurred to me more than once
> over the last
> year or so whenever documentation and standardization issues
> arise in this
> group. The idea is that the Fusebox methodology would lend itself
> beautifully to a Pattern Language, a la Christopher Alexander,
> the Gang of
> Four, etc.
I entirely agree. In fact, the more I think about it, the more it
makes sense. And when you look at the original whitepapers, all
of those "Techniques" are essentially design patterns. Simply
formalizing those in a pattern language and giving them
recognizable names would accomplish exactly what I'm after. And
it would save us from having to rely on a constantly outdated,
centralized document.
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
