This might be the case, but why should be the new interface be better than
the old one?
I have seen a lot of XP computers where sighted people were working at a
time before Windows 7 and not everyone of said sighted persons found the new
start menu of XP better than the old one.
I also heard several sighted people say that ribbons were not their prefered
way of using their Office products.
In not all cases, but a few, there was the opinion that functionality is
more important than the question whether an element of an interface is
located in the top left corner of the screen or the bottom right corner...
And "because" the mobile phone has a different interface, the computer needs
it to, is not an argument for me.
And this is because a computer or even a netbook is not a mobile phone.
Yes, it is surely not bad if a new computer has multi Touch capable
hardware, then why shouldn't be there software for said purpose.
But because there are touchscreens does not mean that all mouses or
keyboards are going to get destroyed this moment.
I think it is not the best idea if we limit ourselves to just one method of
doing things, when everyone should have the freedom to do things the way he
or she likes best, as long, as it is not destroying your productivity (if we
are not talking about end users)...
---
Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gamers@audyssey.org.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.
