Hi Stu:
I am not too familiar with Debian and Ubuntu packaging but I just wanted
make sure you and Jeff are aware of each other's work. Obviously we do not
want any duplicated efforts. :)
Going forward do you guys have any recommendations on how we can improve
the Debian packaging files within our repository such that anybody
downloading our official tarballs could build Debian packages out of it?
Many thanks!
Bernard
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012, Stu Teasdale wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > Just to clarify: are there any bug fixes you had to apply on 3.3.5 that
> > were never required on 3.3.1?
> >
> > In other words, there are no regressions between 3.3.1 and 3.3.5?
> All the fixes are to the packaging itself, rather than ganglia, and are
> present in the current debian unstable release.
>
> Stu
> --
> >From the prompt of Stu Teasdale
>
> There is a Massachusetts law requiring all dogs to have their hind legs
> tied during the month of April.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Ganglia-developers mailing list
> Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
