Hi,

W dniu 5.07.2023 o 00:57, Martin Uecker pisze:
Am Dienstag, dem 04.07.2023 um 16:46 +0200 schrieb Rafał Pietrak:...
[--------]

Yes. named address spaces would be great. And for code, too.


While certainly some work, implementation effort for
new kinds of named address spaces  does not seem to be
terrible at first glance:

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/adding-support-for-named-address-spaces.html

Oh! I see. this is good news. Although that internals documentation is complete black magic to me and I cannot tell heads from tails in it, the surrounding comments sound promising... like GCC-13 actually had the internal "machinery" supporting named address spaces and just cpu-platform specific code is missing (for all but "SPU port"). Is that right?

And if it's so ... there is no mention of how does it show up for "simple user" of the GCC (instead of the use of that "machinery" by creators of particular GCC port). In other words: how the sources should look like for the compiler to do "the thing"?

-R

Reply via email to