> I’d also not accept big infrastructure designed by LLMs. I still hope for > sensible use of LLMs for GCC, like finishing long neglected partial > transitions. I do not think LLMs are ready to implement new compiler > features.
Yes, that seems to be a safe and sensible middle ground, in other words to limit changes to the local "scope" so that any mistakes made are also local. Something (slightly) above mechanical, but certainly nowhere near global. -- Eric Botcazou
