> I think that patches which contain LLM-generated code need to receive > special care from *reviewers*, as well (to be formalized how?)
Can you say what kind of "special" care you are advocating?
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Eric Botcazou
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Thomas Koenig via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Giacomo Tesio
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Thomas Koenig via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Richard Kenner via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Giacomo Tesio
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Eric Botcazou
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Giacomo Tesio
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Richard Kenner
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Richard Kenner via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Thomas Koenig via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Richard Kenner via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Joseph Myers via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Albert, Christopher via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Giacomo Tesio
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Albert, Christopher via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fi... Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Florian Weimer via Gcc
- Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bu... Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
