Hi Thomas, On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:28:53 +0200 Thomas Koenig wrote:
> I think that patches which contain LLM-generated code need to receive > special care from *reviewers*, as well (to be formalized how?) To this aim, our corporate policy mandates inclusion of prompts in commits containing LLM output (together with tool name and version). Over time, this helped a lot developers here to build an effective insight about the issues that might pass unnoticed. Over time we also independently adopted a habit to isolate LLM output into dedicated commits, that proved very useful during post-mortem and unexpected-costs analysis (bugs, security incidents...). Giacomo
