Am 25.04.26 um 10:54 schrieb Giacomo Tesio:
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:28:53 +0200 Thomas Koenig wrote:
I think that patches which contain LLM-generated code need to receive
special care from *reviewers*, as well (to be formalized how?)
To this aim, our corporate policy mandates inclusion of prompts in
commits containing LLM output (together with tool name and version).
That may be a good thing, or not. Cluttering up commits is one concern
that I have. Also, for review, patches should speak for themselves.
I also do not understand how this helps with what you write below:
Over time, this helped a lot developers here to build an effective
insight about the issues that might pass unnoticed.
Best regards
Thomas
