On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:11:41AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Right. However, the wording I saw was much broader than just the >> plugin model. It was vague and poorly worded, and you could interpret >> it as saying that use of a non-GPL assembler or linker was also not >> allowed to build or link the libraries. > > That's the version that was dumped, exactly for the reasons you state. > Excellent. I'm glad to hear that since I had also seen it and thought that it was unacceptable in general (speaking for myself).
Anyhow, I hope to see all of this resolved at some point. -eric
