On 06/07/2010 11:40 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > I think a big way of solving this is through a non technical solution > of having a person who just go through patches and mentors the "non > regular" developers. > The only point I want to stress again, or maybe clarify, is that if a *person* is going to do that, I expect the "entity" to behave like a person, thus intelligently, thus not sending out standardized requests about patches which obviously have been committed already, as any *human* can quickly understand looking at gcc-cvs, svn, whatever. If you tell me that it would be a rather stressful job, I agree, and that's why I think we should find a way to automate it, assuming it's a real issue to somebody.
Paolo.
