> Two things: 1) we should make the [bracket] prefixes more standard for > patches destined to feature branches;
> Another point about (1): I believe patchwork should *not* track most of > the branch patches, and the commit detection shouldn't care about > release branch commits, only trunk. This is because those are 99% of > the time for trunk too, and whether the patches went on the release > branches is effectively already tracked via bugzilla. Patches that go to trunk first, and then to some branch, should already be handled correctly as far as I can see. So there is no need to mark email messages specially for this. > 2) we should likely not send > multiple patches in one email as attachments. We shouldn't do that anyway :-) Maybe patchwork can even handle this, dunno. Segher