> Two things: 1) we should make the [bracket] prefixes more standard for
> patches destined to feature branches;

> Another point about (1): I believe patchwork should *not* track most of
> the branch patches, and the commit detection shouldn't care about
> release branch commits, only trunk.  This is because those are 99% of
> the time for trunk too, and whether the patches went on the release
> branches is effectively already tracked via bugzilla.

Patches that go to trunk first, and then to some branch, should already
be handled correctly as far as I can see.  So there is no need to mark
email messages specially for this.

> 2) we should likely not send
> multiple patches in one email as attachments.

We shouldn't do that anyway :-)

Maybe patchwork can even handle this, dunno.


Segher

Reply via email to