Greetings! Raymond Toy <toy.raym...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 6:51 AM Camm Maguire <c...@maguirefamily.org> wrote: > > Greetings, and great to hear from you both again! > > I've posted this query several places, and I've received another comment > indicating that macports is for older machines (i.e. 'retro people' :-)) > and homebrew more modern. If macports could support both older and > newer versions, it makes sense to focus there. However, like you, my > mac development environment is stuck at Catalina for reasons we've > discussed. Everything works there for GCL, both 2.6 and 2.7, but I am > worried about support for up to date machines. I have yet to try > Kirill's remote ssh into a github action, which may be the solution, but > ideally there would be a workaround by now to get a virtualbox under > linux or the like to run a more modern macosx. Perfect would be remote > access to a modern mac. Thoughts? > > How modern? I've set up a virtualbox on linux to run macosx but only > for intel. I think that means 10.15 or so. If you want the new ARM > chips, I don't think virtualbox can do that. I think you need to use > qemu for that. I've never succeeded on getting qemu to run anything. > Yes, I run Catalina, aka 11.3, but current mac is at Sequoia, aka 16. I have been told that attempting to upgrade this virtual box beyond where it is will render it unusable/inaccessible due to a policy decision by Apple. Take care, -- Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
