-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#review8336
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh (line 108)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7228>

    all these members could be const?



src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh (line 147)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7230>

    unsigned? if not it really needs a comment



src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh (line 150)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7229>

    ==
    
    it is unsigned



src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (line 93)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7231>

    should this perhaps even be a warn (or do we ever expect this to happen in 
a correct setup?



src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (line 113)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7232>

    could you add an assert here that size >= packet->length?



src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (line 176)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7233>

    all reschedule instead?



src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc (line 339)
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/#comment7234>

    Does this break checkpoint compatibility?
    
    If so that needs to be addressed.


- Andreas Hansson


On May 23, 2016, 8:08 p.m., Mohammad Alian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 23, 2016, 8:08 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 11472:d4fada3b46ac
> ---------------------------
> dist, dev: Fixed the packet ordering in etherswitch
> This patch fixes the order that packets gets pushed into the output fifo
> of etherswitch. If two packets arrive at the same tick to the etherswitch,
> we sort and push them based on their source port id.
> In dist-gem5 simulations, if there is no ordering inforced while two
> packets arrive at the same tick, it can lead to non-deterministic simulations
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.hh 954d3014f7f0 
>   src/dev/net/etherswitch.cc 954d3014f7f0 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3465/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mohammad Alian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to