U-verse is here, they've come knocking around my neighborhood a couple of
times

ronnie

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Ray <rdej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is AT&T not deploying its "U-verse" fiber network in EBR?  They are in
> Hammond and on the west bank, and other areas around here.   So I
> wonder what happens when Eatel approaches a parish and says we want to
> run fiber all over your parish, and AT&T says nope we already did
> that.
>
> ray
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:42 PM, mat branyon <mat.bran...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Who are you kidding? You still had those business ISDN lines well after
> it
> > stopped being cool.
> >
> > I remember having eatel dialup in livingston parish almost 10 years ago,
> and
> > them helping me try to get it working on my linux box.  Nice guys all
> > around.
> >
> > On Aug 18, 2011 10:06 AM, "Edmund Cramp" <e...@motion-labs.com> wrote:
> >> Let's face it, COX does not want any competition because otherwise COX
> >> would have to start offering competitive rates.
> >>
> >> As for the "build-out" clause - I can see the reason for it, essentially
> >> it's social engineering but I think a better way of encouraging
> universal
> >> service would be to simply tax the service areas differently - this
> would
> >> give all of the companies an incentive to support the less densely
> populated
> >> areas. Otherwise "build-out" becomes a monopoly for COX preventing
> smaller
> >> businesses from entering the market.
> >>
> >> Does anyone remember the maneuvering when the Lafayette decided to offer
> >> internet service locally? Both COX and AT&T fought tooth and nail to
> stop
> >> them.
> >>
> >> As a business I was with EAtel when they did service Baton Rouge and
> they
> >> were a pleasure to work with - this is back in the days when ISDN was
> cool -
> >> and they knew how to provision a line in one visit. I've love to give
> them a
> >> try again. I don't like monopolies.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Edmund Cramp
> >> --
> >> Motion Lab Systems, Inc.
> >> 15045 Old Hammond Highway, Baton Rouge, LA 70816 USA
> >> Tel: +1 (225) 272-7364 | Fax: +1 (225) 272-7336
> >> Web: http://www.motion-labs.com
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: general-boun...@brlug.net
> >>> [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Brad Bendily
> >>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:52 AM
> >>> To: general@brlug.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Eatel wants in Baton Rouge
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Byron Como <bc...@cox.net> wrote:
> >>> > I think its a good thing.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> http://theadvocate.com/home/619880-79/eatel-asks-to-offer-services.htm
> >>> > l
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> strange. they used to be in BR years ago.. .now they want back in?
> >>>
> >>> I have mixed feelings about the controversy that Cox brings up.
> >>> One the one hand, they should be held to the same standard as
> >>> everyone else, but on the other hand, i would like to see
> >>> local businesses get some advantages over national business.
> >>>
> >>> what do you guys think?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Have Mercy & Say Yeah
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> General mailing list
> >>> General@brlug.net
> >>> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> General mailing list
> >> General@brlug.net
> >> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > General@brlug.net
> > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@brlug.net
> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to