>
>
> Hadoop 2.0 has been years of work in the making and is finally relatively
> close.  I think it would be a mistake to throw another impediment in the
> way of getting a stable version of 2.0 done, as many folks have pointed
> out.  So I'd suggest that we plan to do a split once there is a broad
> consensus that 2.0 is stable and widely deployed.
>
>
+1 for revisiting the split once we have stable Hadoop 2.0 with large-scale
and wide deployments.

Reply via email to