You summarized my thoughts exactly :-) Martijn
On 7/31/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll start by saying I'm not deeply involved in the roadmap plans, so pay more attention to the other devs, but this seems a possible position to me, i.e. All source hosted at ASF, lists & web moved to ASF. - 1.2.x Continue in maintainance/bug-fix mode 'wicket.*' package name 'wicket-1.2.x' jar names, etc SF-hosted releases? - 1.3 Developed (basically 1.2+ some new features from HEAD (2.x)) 'wicket.*' package name 'wicket-incubating-1.3.x' jar names, etc ASF-hosted releases? - 2.x Primary development branch 'org.apache.wicket.*' package name 'wicket-incubating-2.x' jar names, etc ASF-hosted releases Thoughts? /Gwyn On 31/07/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 31 July 2006 07:27, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > This way the old branch will still be "supported". > > But none of the users should expect that the new features will be > > ported back to the old releases. > > And perhaps even incubate the 1.3, in case there are strong enough interest to > keep developing the 1.x line. That would give signals to the user community > that the 1.x will continue and be actively supported under the same home. > > And that only some bug fixing point releases are made in 1.2.x to avoid > scaring off sensitive users (like myself --- just kidding). > > > Cheers > Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! Embed Wicket components in your portals! -- http://wicketframework.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]