Greg Stein wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > [snip] > ... I think there is going to be some concern that > we're "forcing/rushing" the process, but I believe the speed is simply > a function of the awesome match in ideals.
Agreed. > > Perhaps this Vote phase should run for a while. > > (I am thinking about setting precedents for other > > incubation proposals.) > > I was planning a standard 72-hour vote, concluding Saturday. Do you > feel that it should be extended further? If it was any other group, then i would be more concerned. Because Subversion has such a synergy with ASF, then okay. > > By the way, it would probably be good to list your initial > > committers in the proposal, as we suggest for other proponents. > > That adds it to these mail list archives. > > The proposal included the list by reference > (http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/COMMITTERS). Do you think it > best to be explicit, and list them in this thread? In general i do think it best to be explicit. We ask others to. Because you refer to a file in yesterday's SVN with explicit line numbers, then i am happier. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
