Nick, are you still -1 because of the name, or will you change your vote based on Alan's comment that the name could change when it graduates? My thinking, is that if the project graduates to Commons then it'll naturally be Commons Validator v2, whereas if it graduates to Geronimo it would be a Geronimo Validation component.....
-Donald On 2/23/10 12:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500 > Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our >> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote. >> >> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be >> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Validation podling. The goal >> is to build a community around delivering a JSR-303 Bean Validation >> implementation based on a new incoming codebase from Agimatec GmbH. >> >> The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal > > -1 to a project that could end up being called "Apache Validation" or > just "Validation". That's too big/general a word for a project name. > > No objection under a changed name. I'd suggest adding an > adjective to indicate what is being validated. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
