+1 a big one of course! I communicated with agimatec-validator guys a few times and they needed at longest 4 hours to respond to my questions and apply my patches :)
This project will be a great add to Apacheland! LieGrue, strub --- Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> schrieb am Mi, 24.2.2010: > Von: Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean > Validation > An: general@incubator.apache.org, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> > Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Februar, 2010 04:22 Uhr > +1 to accept Validation into > the Incubator > > afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up > > however I for sure want to see this at Apache. > > If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !! > > -M > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > We're leaving the TLP/sub-project decision till > graduation... > > > > -Donald > > > > > > On 2/23/10 5:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> As I understand it from the proposal, they intend > to be Apache Commons Validation. > >> > >> On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500 > >>> Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Given the lack of response on the proposal > and the push from our > >>>> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume > lazy consensus and call a vote. > >>>> > >>>> I would like to present for a vote the > following proposal to be > >>>> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new > Validation podling. The goal > >>>> is to build a community around delivering > a JSR-303 Bean Validation > >>>> implementation based on a new incoming > codebase from Agimatec GmbH. > >>>> > >>>> The proposal is available on the wiki at > and included below: > >>>> > >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ValidationProposal > >>> > >>> -1 to a project that could end up being called > "Apache Validation" or > >>> just "Validation". That's too big/general a > word for a project name. > >>> > >>> No objection under a changed name. I'd > suggest adding an > >>> adjective to indicate what is being > validated. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Nick Kew > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Brett Porter > >> br...@apache.org > >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org