On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and > ready for your testing and voting. > > > Release candidate artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
The source archive is missing several chunks of what is in the SVN tag. None of the following directory trees are in the source archive: branding/ docs/ lib/ Are none of these needed for building/testing the software? If they are purely for building the web-site, then maybe that would be cleaner as a separate SVN tree. > > > SVN tag revision: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4_RC3/ The SVN tag contains lots of .exe files under the lib tree. Is it *really* necessary for these to be in SVN? For example, Gallio appears to be a test framework for NET. Projects that use a Java test framework such as JUnit don't normally include JUnit in their SVN, they just document it as a pre-requisite or fetch it at run-time if necessary. Similarly for the other .exe files. > > > The vote is open for 72 hours (we can extend this if people feel the US > Thanksgiving holiday will impact the vote) > > > > Thanks to the Lucene contributors and committers for their hard work, and > special thanks to Stefan for helping me get this release ready to roll out > the door. > > > > > > Thanks, > > ~Prescott > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
