On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:

>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is
>> not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!)

> Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required might be a
> blocking problem but including just a little more than is necessary
> isn't IMHO. If it was a podling release with so much unnecessary stuff
> that it showed they didn't really understand the requirements maybe
> thats worth voting against so they go and sort it out but for
> something like this i think its ok to say sort it out later

Agreed.  I'll make sure it gets sorted out before the next release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-458

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to