On 1/10/2012 3:50 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > The IPMC is perfectly capable (in its own sometimes messy way) to deal > with this issue. In fact the board has explicitly delegated the > responsibility of "acceptance and oversight of new products submitted > or proposed to become part of the Foundation" to the IPMC.
Not if there is a foundation-wide policy, we aren't. The IPMC can no more violate our rules on accepting forks than it can accept GPL'ed projects, without the board revisiting policy. This is not G v. R arguing we should or shouldn't accept forks, this is G v. R arguing that a foundation-wide policy already exists. Let the board square it up. If the answer is 'depends', then you are right, incubator would have been the committee to weight those conditions. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
