On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As i've said i don't think thats a >> very good rule and doesn't seem like its really been thought through >> properly. For example, its kept saying that the podling would go to >> the ASF Attic but the Attic is only for TLPs so retired podlings don't >> go there. > > That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in. > Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings?
I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were sorted out. With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to check back with the Attic people if they can handle this. Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho its the reason why its there. >> How about before adding a new rule to the policy page we just try it >> with a few of the old podlings first to see what happens and from that >> find what sort of rule might work? > > That would be fine too. Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people feel. I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention. Thanks! > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --- http://www.grobmeier.de The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL @grobmeier GPG: 0xA5CC90DB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
