On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier > <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in. > >> Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings? > > > > I am not sure if there is a real reason, but maybe its because the attic > > currently contains only "real" ASF projects where all legal things were > > sorted out. > > > > With a podling coming in this might not be the case. We would need to > > check back with the Attic people if they can handle this. > > > > Otherwise I don't see a reason why we shouldn't use the attic, imho > > its the reason why its there. > > Quick question: who's in charge of saying 'yay' or 'nay' to Incubator > projects coming to the Attic? > > > Roman, would you mind to create an update patch and send it around > > here for some kind of discussing/voting? Then we would see how people > feel. > > I think this thread is already to big to get the right attention. > > Will do shortly. Btw, I presume you're talking about the patch > to the Incubator web pages documenting the policy, right? > > At least that's what I'm going to patch and send for a VOTE > > > What happpened to you agreeing to try it with a few of the old podlings first? ...ant
