On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > I am in favor of #3 since it holds mentors accountable. #1 is simply a > washing of > our hands and pawning the problem off on the board simple because some of us > are unwilling to do uncomfortable things.
Here's the bit that seems to be misunderstood a lot in pTLP discussion: the appealing part of that proposal is making mentors part of *real* PMCs of *real* projects, as opposed to being beholden to a vague committee (IPMC). In my (and a few others) opinion, this is the only structuring of incentive that would make a needle on mentors being there *for real*. At least as real as all the other PMCs of TLPs (which should be as good as it gets at ASF). That said, lets argue this in a thread where it belongs (the one started by Benson). Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
