About the https://opendal.apache.org/docs/python/opendal.html, it is already on the apache.org site. It is obvious that it belongs to the ASF.
About other distribution platforms, using short names, rather than apache or asf prefixes is a common practice. Keeping the readme clear and stating it is an Apache project, is a good practice. And AFAIK, pypi, crates, docs should be updated accordingly and have to rely on the next release. For other projects, which are not controlled by the committers, it takes time to add Apache. None of the found ones seem to hurt ASF branding. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2023年12月27日周三 15:15写道： > > HI, > > > >> 2. https://opendal.apache.org/docs/python/opendal.html > > This is not fixed. I suggest the PMC members have a good read of our branding > policy to understand what is needed here. [1] At a minimum, the project needs > to be referred to as “Apache OpenDAL”, and the trademark attribution needs to > be added. Please see [2] as well, in particular [3] and [4], but there are > other issues here as well. > > > NOTE: pypi.org, crates.io, docs.rs will be updated after our next release > > published. > > Can you fix the description and add the trademark attributions without making > a release? > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility > 2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs > 3. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#naming > 4. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#attributions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
