On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 20:38, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On 4/30/02 11:31 PM, "John McNally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I do not know where to locate Turbine's original charter and I think it > > is a good idea to try to follow it. Are these published somewhere or > > should Turbine maintain it in its own documentation? However the scope > > of a subproject is likely to grow/evolve over time. Velocity does > > provide at least one servlet that allows it to be used to develop a > > webapp independent of any other framework. > > I think that's stretching 'webapp' I guess tomcat does the same thing as it > supplies servlets... :)
Well I would not be bothered if tomcat had developed a build system that it packaged as an independent entity with the idea that it might be more generally useful. Tomcat is a large project and they certainly could have had the itch. And if they promoted it occasionally what's the big deal. > > > Struts is adding support for > > Velocity even though one of its primary reasons for being proposed with > > Turbine already existing was to limit the view to jsp exclusively. > > I think you are mistaken - we are building a toolkit to use Velocity as the > view layer in Struts.... Struts isn't adding any support AFAIK. > Okay, I guess I could argue that developing a taglib (or something more elaborate) is outside the scope of a project around a template engine. Except that I am arguing against such strict definition of scope. And from what I saw I thought it was pretty cool. john mcnally -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
