On 5/1/02 12:21 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On 4/30/02 11:31 PM, "John McNally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I do not know where to locate Turbine's original charter and I think it >>> is a good idea to try to follow it. Are these published somewhere or >>> should Turbine maintain it in its own documentation? However the scope >>> of a subproject is likely to grow/evolve over time. Velocity does >>> provide at least one servlet that allows it to be used to develop a >>> webapp independent of any other framework. >> >> I think that's stretching 'webapp' I guess tomcat does the same thing as it >> supplies servlets... :) > > Not at all. Would you not consider Eyebrowse a web app? It's built > entirely upon a VelocityServlet extension. :) Yes, that was a 'thinko' on my part. I meant 'framework' - I was trying to say that Velocity has no intention of becoming a webapp framework... -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting Maven & Gump are friends -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
