On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 02:19 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:I think the goal should be that the PMC should include all committers thatOn Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:Jeffrey Dever wrote:I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for
Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the
time, including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons
as it is rather a large project with a dedicated mailing list and a
rich family where many, such as myself, are primarily focused on just
one project, HttpClient.
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.Would it be quicker just to make all active committers PMC members by default?
are active and have been around for a while ( 3..6 months seems reasonable).
Agreed
Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount of time? How else would they be a committer?
I like the current system of proposing release managers - as it encourages
people to do this work. Proposing people who are taking a very active role
in various projects would also be good.
I don't think all active committers should be PMC members by default - maybe
after few months if they stick around and continue to be active.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-956-2604(w)
Adeptra, Inc. 203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
