On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
Why is the assumption that all of these people are looking for
chandlerproject? If they are, why aren't they clicking on one of
the three links? If they can't obviously see how to get to Chandler
then we can fix that without forwarding.
Because the volume is high enough to make it unlikely that that are
looking for the non-profit
Do we have some data showing that these people aren't going to
osafoundation.org to check out OSAF?
Traffic seems to correspond to blog post traffic spikes
Are we certain that this number won't decrease significantly once
we lose the current osafoundation.org page rank? Maybe the reason
we have so many more osafoundation.org hits is because the page
rank is high, forwarding it won't help us if that is the case.
It's much riskier in my opinion to do the forward. We can redesign
the page to make it more obvious how to get to Chandler and cut
down the risk significantly.
Also, do we have any idea why these bloggers are linking to
osafoundation.org instead of chandlerproject.org? Are we not
pushing this link in the product and in the marketing enough?
Google "chandler". What link comes up at the top? If you didn't
know we changed the project url, would you look any further?
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
