On Friday 04 November 2005 02:52, Nathan L. Adams wrote: > Let me say it one more time. I'm not saying you have to have a web > browser installed on the system that you are updating or installing. > I'm saying that the GuideXML docs are the standard, official source of > documentation and the same should hold true for the migration guides. > I'm also saying that feedback from users said they want ONE official > place to find this stuff. Therefor any plan that doesn't take both of > those things into account is silly. And having the GuideXML-ized guides > on a central website marked as the 'official-one-stop-for-errata' does > not in any way shape or form preclude anyone from mirroring that info > in a text file, forum post, emerge --news, mailing list, etc. etc. ad > nauseum.
GuideXML would not be an appropriate format in any case. GuideXML is too bloated with presentation items to be of use for such a purpose. While one could argue for an xml source version, it would certainly not be guidexml. This is also not necessary as it is possible to easilly apply double transformations by first transforming a file into guidexml and then into html. Look at the herds.xml file or projectxml for an example of this. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpPVzeKlt0GC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
