On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just bump the filename suffix when it is required to support a > new EAPI that breaks the sourcing rules of previous EAPIs? > > Or will backwards-incompatible changes be happening so frequently that > the package suffix will have to change for every EAPI bump anyway, > which would make this proposal equivalent to GLEP55?
That works. Although, we'd have to keep track of two parameters when setting our EAPI. One being the EAPI itself and the suffix needed for that EAPI. So this doesn't seem to make the problem simpler. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
