On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: >> >> I don't think we're in a hurry for this feature, so I don't see the >> need of using suboptimal hacks in order to avoid an EAPI bump. >> Furthermore, EAPI 2 is supposed to be done in the near future, right? >> >> Regards, > > I don't view the RESTRICT=live idea as "suboptimal" or "a hack" in > any way. I see it as a legitimate use of an existing ebuild variable > that's already used for lots of other legitimate purposes. >
Let me rephrase the point as that this method should not be favoured over others just because it doesn't require an EAPI bump. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
