Samuli Suominen schrieb: > that's my impression now too since nobody has managed to provide useful > case for separate /usr, or they have been very vague like adding 1+1 on > / and /usr filesystem sizes and counting the risk of corrupted > filesystem from that (one word: backup)
Maybe I have to explain in more detail: When is there a risk of data corruption involving /usr? For example, when the filesystem which contains /usr is being written to while the power fails or the kernel panics. But /usr is almost never written to, it is the other directories like /home, /var or the upcoming /run. Backup is orthogonal to this question. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
