By the way, Diego, what is you current point of view on Gentoo default init system? i.e., what do you personally prefer to see as default init here: SystemD or OpenRC?
[Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are on "non-SysD-related udev" side.] And, if anyone is interested in my opinion: I *HATE* when somebody (will it be distro maintainers or RedHat corporation) forcing me their opinion on _what_ should I use and _how_ should I use this. Thats why I hate Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, RHEL, SuSE and so on. Thats why I'm using Gentoo and Gentoo-derivatives (Sabayon, for example) for almost 10 years. Thats why I am an evangelist of Gentoo and it's derivatives. More of that, thats why Daniel Robbins created Gentoo itself. So, I really hope, that Gentoo will not obey RedHat's will and will not force SystemD as default init system, and not drop pretty OpenRC to trash. And I hope, that ryao's eudev will be most used (if not default) variant of udev, since I'm sad with last vanilla udev functionality "downgrades". -- Best, mva 18.11.2012 15:21, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: > On 18/11/2012 00:08, Greg KH wrote: >> But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo >> Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to >> take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I >> have something to say about it, as it affects me, a Gentoo developer. > > Please note that I would be the first one, from a QA point of view, to > raise a huge question mark if somebody is planning to make this the > default anytime soon. > > You want to keep it around as an option? Sure, feel free. > > Moving as default? Over my dead public key. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
