To be honest, in my opinion, «killing of separate /usr» can reasonable be continued by moving all it's content to / (/usr/bin -> /bin, /usr/lib -> lib, and so on) in despite of all objections, as it was invented just because of disk space exhaustion.
18.11.2012 22:16, Samuli Suominen пишет: > On 18/11/12 17:04, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> On 18/11/2012 03:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: >>> >>> [Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think >>> that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are >>> on "non-SysD-related udev" side.] >> >> The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything >> I've been doing lately. As many other developers can easily attest, I >> don't use systemd and I'm not planning to use it anytime soon. >> >> So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected. > > Same here. I haven't even tried it and got no plans to. > > I'm still happy enough with building udev out from systemd tree and > letting sep. /usr consept from 90s to finally die in favour of > simplifying the system. > The BIOSes have been upgraded last century to support booting from > larger partitions, the need has long past. > Nobody has ever provided a valid reason for using sep. /usr in the ML > either. > > - Samuli >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
