El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all > > > > Why don't you drop "~" from: > > CONFIG_CHECK="~DEVTMPFS" > > > > to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent breakage? > > > > That won't work because the host you run the package isn't necessarily > same as the one you are building it on > The build host doesn't need DEVTMPFS > >
And couldn't that be done at install time? I mean, you can build and package new udev but installation will die if udev is going to be installed on a system without DEVTMPFS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
