-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/01/13 05:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: >> On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen >>> escribió: >>>> please review this news item, seems we need one after all >>> >>> Why don't you drop "~" from: CONFIG_CHECK="~DEVTMPFS" >>> >>> to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent >>> breakage? >>> >> >> That won't work because the host you run the package isn't >> necessarily same as the one you are building it on The build host >> doesn't need DEVTMPFS >> >> > > And couldn't that be done at install time? I mean, you can build > and package new udev but installation will die if udev is going to > be installed on a system without DEVTMPFS
There's too many variables, though -- firstly, /usr/src/linux/.config may not match /proc/config.gz. And even if both are checked there's nothing to say that the next boot is going to use a kernel that matches either one. Realistically, what udev needs is something at runtime to report the error and temporarily bypass the requirement, because this really is a runtime issue instead of something that can be properly controlled or contained at build/install time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlEBVgIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBzfQD/ZAE4UHgQJ3zB9wuVkCcPAhXS 21C+7k+mjS2YSg8BgqcA/0iv12JreFnvmybX2H8a/g8BBKm30+Xbt1+bGC+rijYN =qA5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
