2013/1/23 Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> > El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > > On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: > > >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all > > > > > > Why don't you drop "~" from: > > > CONFIG_CHECK="~DEVTMPFS" > > > > > > to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent > breakage? > > > > > > > That won't work because the host you run the package isn't necessarily > > same as the one you are building it on > > The build host doesn't need DEVTMPFS > > > > > > And couldn't that be done at install time? I mean, you can build and > package new udev but installation will die if udev is going to be > installed on a system without DEVTMPFS >
Pacho, see the message from robbat2 titled "RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default"
