On 08/08/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-08, o godz. 11:29:06
hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
On 08/08/2013 01:49 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Seeing the noise in #gentoo from people getting whacked in the kidney by
the systemd sidegrade ... that's a very optimistic decision.
It'll cause lots of pain for users that suddenly can't start lvm
properly and other nasty landmines hidden in the "upgrade path". By
stabilizing this early you're causing lots of extra work for others.
I hope you understand that some of us will be very rude and just suggest
to unmerge gnome on all support requests as it now moves outside our
support range ...
+1
Stabilizing it is wrong.
Leave it in ~arch forever, because it is incompatible with system
packages. (virtual/service-manager)
If it's going to stay in ~arch, we should also drop all stable GNOME
versions to ~arch. I don't really see keeping old and unsupported
software stable for that long.
+1, the old libraries gnome 2.x needs in stable is already causing trouble.
to name the first one that comes to mind, the stable gnome-base/gvfs
gnome 2.x needs fails with UDisks2.
overall i'm not intrested in stabilization of gnome 3.x but getting rid
of 'the blocker called gnome 2.x*
- Samuli
