On 06/29/2014 10:03 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 >> >> Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker >>> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by >>> the virtualization team (and Diego (flameeyes). And docker depends on >>> lxc-1.0.0 according to the ebuild. But now that you have unmasked >>> docker, i think the deptree will be broken since lxc is still masked. >> >> Repoman is monitored; therefore, someone from the QA team or so has >> probably masked Docker. Given that broken dependency tree again it is >> likely to happen again. So, please set it up a satisfiable state. :) > > AutoRepoman :) > > So that was me fixing the depgraph, taking the easy way out of adding an > unsatisfiable package to an existing related package.mask. > > If people can't be bothered to even run repoman full or commit without > --force > they'll get annoyed by my corrections - maybe it has an educational effect ;) > > Have fun, > > Patrick >
Thanks for the explanation Patrick -- Regards, Markos Chandras
