On 06/29/2014 09:12 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 > Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker >> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by >> the virtualization team (and Diego (flameeyes). And docker depends on >> lxc-1.0.0 according to the ebuild. But now that you have unmasked >> docker, i think the deptree will be broken since lxc is still masked. > > Repoman is monitored; therefore, someone from the QA team or so has > probably masked Docker. Given that broken dependency tree again it is > likely to happen again. So, please set it up a satisfiable state. :) > It's been a long time and sources.g.o is down so i can't check the history of that file. I think docker-1.0 was not present when i first committed >=lxc-1.0.0 in the tree. So, when docker-1.0 was committed, maybe repoman full was not checked, leading to a docker with broken deps and maybe QA team masked it because of that.
Anyway apologies for the inconvenience. It was certainly not intentional -- Regards, Markos Chandras
