On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote: >> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 >>> >>> Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker >>>> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by >>>> the virtualization team (and Diego (flameeyes). And docker depends on >>>> lxc-1.0.0 according to the ebuild. But now that you have unmasked >>>> docker, i think the deptree will be broken since lxc is still masked. >>> >>> Repoman is monitored; therefore, someone from the QA team or so has >>> probably masked Docker. Given that broken dependency tree again it is >>> likely to happen again. So, please set it up a satisfiable state. :) >> >> AutoRepoman :) >> >> So that was me fixing the depgraph, taking the easy way out of adding an >> unsatisfiable package to an existing related package.mask. >> >> If people can't be bothered to even run repoman full or commit without >> --force they'll get annoyed by my corrections - maybe it has an educational >> effect ;) >> >> Have fun, >> >> Patrick > > Tadaah: > > dependency.bad 22 > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- > emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- > emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- > emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- > emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: > ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] > >
Yeah, lets wait for Greg or Tianon to reply and if docker+lxc works for them we can unmask lxc. -- Regards, Markos Chandras
