On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:50:25 +0100 "viv...@gmail.com" <viv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il 15/01/2015 11:30, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 +0000 (UTC) > > Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > > > >> Christopher Head <ch...@chead.ca> wrote: > >>> All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be > >>> fine if no package actually uses the feature yet. > >> ++ > >> > >> More precisely: When changing the names anyway, > >> IMHO it would be a very good idea to follow the convention of the > >> "flag" names in /proc/cpuinfo and add all flags supported > >> there as possible USE-flags, no matter, whether they are currently > >> used in some package or not. > > > > seriously ? > > > > $ grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 1 | wc -w > > 94 > > > > Actually I like the idea, there are performances problems related to > ebuilds or portage? it is not about performance but rather about writing the proper .desc file; i don't think this will ever happen if nobody baking up the idea comes with such a file Alexis.
