On 16 Feb 2015 11:45, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 16 Feb 2015 21:00, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Thus I suggest making the following warnings proper errors: > > > > some of these are because they produce false positives. at least these bugs > > probably need to be fixed first: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/405017 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/488836 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/533460 > > I think that just the last bug is still valid.
the first is still broken: $ cd dev-python/boto/ $ cvs up $ repoman full RepoMan scours the neighborhood... Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' profiles RepoMan sez: "If everyone were like you, I'd be out of business!" $ rm *.ebuild $ cvs up >&/dev/null $ repoman full RepoMan scours the neighborhood... ebuild.badheader 17 dev-python/boto/boto-2.11.0.ebuild: Invalid Gentoo Copyright on line: 1 dev-python/boto/boto-2.19.0.ebuild: Invalid Gentoo Copyright on line: 1 ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
