-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/15 09:40 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > At the very least, we need to be able to tag REQUIRED_USE > conflicts with human readable error messages. OK, so I know I > can't have USE="qt4 qt5" for this package... but why? How do I > fix it? We can do that with pkg_pretend and a bunch of "if" > statements, or maybe there's value in having the requirements in > a variable -- who knows. The former is a lot simpler to > implement. > >
I still think it's really important to note the meaning of "Can't" here. "Can't" IMO should still really mean cannot -- that setting both flags is going to cause a problem that'll break the system, conflicts that will cause things to not work. This whole qt4/qt5 discussion isn't about "can't", but about "doesn't." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLWoAACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2GAwD/dgkq8Iyd4njMd2tAvO8zWVOr JddKwKnUxMxT4haGYDYBAIxIQbT5BM3+iHkNWXF8nKm6GXukNKqUODhZl3eNRoUi =kAZd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----