-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/08/15 09:40 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> At the very least, we need to be able to tag REQUIRED_USE
> conflicts with human readable error messages. OK, so I know I
> can't have USE="qt4 qt5" for this package... but why? How do I
> fix it? We can do that with pkg_pretend and a bunch of "if"
> statements, or maybe there's value in having the requirements in
> a variable -- who knows. The former is a lot simpler to
> implement.
> 
> 

I still think it's really important to note the meaning of "Can't"
here.  "Can't" IMO should still really mean cannot -- that setting
both flags is going to cause a problem that'll break the system,
conflicts that will cause things to not work.   This whole qt4/qt5
discussion isn't about "can't", but about "doesn't."


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLWoAACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2GAwD/dgkq8Iyd4njMd2tAvO8zWVOr
JddKwKnUxMxT4haGYDYBAIxIQbT5BM3+iHkNWXF8nKm6GXukNKqUODhZl3eNRoUi
=kAZd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to