On 02-10-2021 23:03:56 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 10:53:37PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> > Guess there's a lot of other options that could be considered as well.
> > 
> > --- files
> > >>> text
> >  * current, it wasn't aligned now that I look at it again
> > (relying only on color to convey type feels clearly wrong to me)
> > 
> > --- files
> > >>>> text
> > [QA] new based on current PR
> > 
> > >>> text
> > [QA] aligned 1 character further, maybe skipping changing >>> is fine?
> > (then again that it's further is what threw me off at first)
> > 
> > >>> text
> > QA* similar to before, but aligned using only 3 chars
> > 
> > >>> text
> > [Q] kinda more obscure but it can work
> > 
> 
> Guess should also add these:
> >>> text
> Q* Notice:
> E* Some error happened
> (closest to before by making use of the former leading space, thus
>  no alignment changes)

FWIW, I like this one.  Perhaps even with lowercase

make[4]: leaving directory src
q* soname lacks version
e* failed to die

Fabian

> 
> >>> text
> QA Notice:
> EE Some error happened
> (at least clearer than Q* Notice, but unsure about no separator.. guess
> it could work?)
> 
> > >>>> text
> > QA* probably closest to how it was before alignment-wise, but meh at 4 >
> > 
> > >>> message
> > QA> not convinced about this one, but throwing it here anyway
> > (other characters could be considered as well)
> > 
> > Maybe a poll of some kind may help, personally undecided on what I
> > like better beside agreeing that a change is needed.
> 
> 
> -- 
> ionen



-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to