On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 14:57 +0000, Eddie Chapman wrote: > Note, I'm not advocating ripping xz-utils out of tree, all I'm saying is > wouldn't it be nice if there were at least 2 alternatives to choose from? > That doesn't have to be disruptive in any way, people who wish to continue > using and trusting xz-utils should be able to continue to do so without > any friction whatsoever.
So, you're basically saying we should go out of our way, recompress all distfiles using two alternative compression formats, increase mirror load four times and add a lot of complexity to ebuilds, right? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
