I think we need to wait and get more facts before we ascribe evil intent to Gentoo based on one person's web site. I don't know either Daniel or the other guy in any way but all we've heard is his side. Strangely, there were no allegations of evil plotting and none of this mattered until the fork announcement was made. As to the reorg I prefer to attribute it to the fact the Gentoo's rapid growth made it obvious that something needed to be done to address growing pain issues - which every company that grows rapidly and beyond expectations has. The timing - well that may be just the way things worked out.


As for me I'm continuing to use Gentoo and will wait until the other side of the story is.




On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:05:42 -0400
 Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2003 09:49 am, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
It is clear there is more to this than Gentoo is letting on ... or
there wouldn't be a reorg going on


The way I see it, reorganization is needed to separate Gentoo the distro from Gentoo Games and perhaps a future Gentoo Embedded.
Daniel has promised an explanation at some vague point in the future. See:
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=3892&offset=45&rows=48#115886


--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Reply via email to